Sid Miller: Editor of Burnside Review

4 mins read

Sid Miller’s first two full-length poetry collections appeared in 2009: Nixon on the Piano (David Robert Books) and Dot-to-Dot, Oregon (Ooligan Press).  This fall he was the writer-in-residence at the Sitka Center for the Arts.  He is the founder and editor of the literary journal Burnside Review.

Natasha Stagg: How does Burnside Review fit into the world of publishing today?

Sid Miller: I think we’re kind of caught in between worlds.  We still are (and will always be) a paper journal.  While we tend to publish less contemporary styled work, our aesthetic is more modern.

NS: Does it do anything that no one else is doing?

SM: I suppose every journal/magazine does something that no one else is doing, purely because of the editors.  Beyond that, our size and visual aesthetic is unique.

NS: Where are you from, and where do you live now?

SM: I am from Honolulu, Hawaii and live in Portland, Oregon.

NS: How do you feel about literary journals in general: simply a necessary means to an end, or something more worthwhile than even anthologies these days?

SM: It’s hard to say, and often depends on my mood.  It’s different with independent journals (such as Burnside Review). Are we a necessity? Of course not.  Is it purely for my vanity?  I hope not. I guess in some ways editing is just another form of artistic expression.

NS: What kind of stuff does your journal publish?

SM: Hard to say. Anything that breaks my heart. Nothing experimental. Something that shows craft, that I can see has been crumpled and revised, crumpled and revised.  Nothing that works solely by smoke and mirrors.

NS: How do we submit?

SM: Never a reading fee, only online. There are reading periods, but they’re never set in stone. Basically 3-5 poems. It still surprises me how many people still continue to screw these basic rules up. The guidelines are up on the website and really simple.  I don’t have much patience for people who can’t follow simple directions.

NS: Do you think literary journals are endangered?

SM: No.

NS: Is becoming “online only” something to be worried about?

SM: We’ll stop being a journal before we switch formats.  Don’t get me wrong, there are some really great online journals, publishing a lot of great work, but it’s nothing I’m interested.  I don’t want to produce something that you can’t put it in your coat pocket and then rest your whiskey on.

NS: Will only the fittest survive, and could this be a good thing?

SM: Of course and of course. We’ve been around 7 years, that’s getting into dinosaur years for an independent. I’ve seen tons come and go. Most people don’t think about sustainability. University presses are a whole different beast.

NS: Had you heard of Sonora Review before this?

SM: Of course. I used to live in Tucson and you’ve rejected my own work very recently.